@@@@@ @   @ @@@@@    @     @ @@@@@@@   @       @  @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@
         @   @   @ @        @ @ @ @    @       @     @   @   @   @   @  @
         @   @@@@@ @@@@     @  @  @    @        @   @    @   @   @   @   @
         @   @   @ @        @     @    @         @ @     @   @   @   @  @
         @   @   @ @@@@@    @     @    @          @      @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@

                        Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
                    Club Notice - 12/01/00 -- Vol. 19, No. 22

       Chair/Librarian: Mark Leeper, 732-817-5619, mleeper@avaya.com
       Factotum: Evelyn Leeper, 732-332-6218, eleeper@lucent.com
       Distinguished Heinlein Apologist: Rob Mitchell, robmitchell@avaya.com
       HO Chair Emeritus: John Jetzt, jetzt@avaya.com
       HO Librarian Emeritus: Nick Sauer, njs@lucent.com
       Back issues at http://www.geocities.com/evelynleeper
       All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.

       The Science Fiction Association of Bergen County meets on the
       second Saturday of every month in Upper Saddle River; call
       201-447-3652 for details.  The Denver Area Science Fiction
       Association meets 7:30 PM on the third Saturday of every month at
       Southwest State Bank, 1380 S. Federal Blvd.

       ===================================================================

       1. A brief trip report of the non-business part of Evelyn  Leeper's
       recent     three-week     to     England     is     available    at
       http://www.geocities.com/evelynleeper/swin_rpt.htm  [-ecl]

       ===================================================================

       2. I was in the library.  I walked back to the  media  section  and
       was  looking at their collection of book on cassettes.  There was a
       large woman, over six feet tall, returning two CDs.   She  and  the
       librarian  were  having  a  spirited argument.  (Believe it or not,
       what  follows  was  about  the  last   minute   of   a   ten-minute
       conversation.)

       "But I only had them out two days.  How can I owe you forty cents?"

       This is a new phenomenon for me.  It started this  year  and  three
       times I have heard people making a loud uproar in a library arguing
       over tiny bits of money.  It would be one thing if the library  was
       wrong  all  the  time,  but  they never seem to be.  We have what I
       consider to be a particularly good library and so when I hear these
       arguments I tend to feel a sympathy for the librarian.  She is part
       of a team that does a very good job  and  just  at  the  moment  is
       trying  to  keep  her conversation quiet when an overbearing patron
       has no such concerns.

       "I don't mind paying, but how can I owe you forty cents?"

       "They are two days overdue."

       "How can they be two days overdue?"

       "They were due Tuesday.  This is Thursday."

       "But how does that make it forty cents?"

       "It's ten cents a day."

       "But it has been only two days."

       "So that is forty cents."

       "No, that's only twenty cents."

       "There are two items, that makes it forty cents."

       "But it was only two days."

       "And there were two items."

       "How much is it a day?"

       "Ten cents."

       "For one item or for two items?"

       "For one item."

       "I thought it was five cents per item."

       "No it's ten cents.  It's posted right here."

       "But then it would be twenty cents.  Ten cents per item."

       "For each day.  There were two days."

       "But you said it was ten cents a day."

       "There were two items."

       "But I just took them out two days ago.  They shouldn't be  overdue
       at all."

       "The records say you took them out last week."

       "Well, I haven't even had a chance to hear them yet.  That's why  I
       asked to take them out again.  I just took them out two days ago."

       "Our records say you took them out Tuesday last week."

       "But it was this week.  No wait a minute.  Two days ago  I  was  at
       teachers' conference.  But I only owe you twenty cents."

       With my head pounding I felt like screaming, "Oh,  lady.   Tell  me
       you aren't a teacher!  You'll give me nightmares."  [-mrl]

       ===================================================================

       3. UNBREAKABLE (a film review by Mark R. Leeper):

                 Capsule: David Dunne is the sole survivor of  a
                 train crash that killed over 300 people.  David
                 completely escaped injury.  This incident and a
                 note  asking  if  he  has every been sick leads
                 David to question his own interpretation of his
                 life  and  his  past.  Elijah Price, an invalid
                 with a strange fixation on comic  books,  draws
                 David  into a strange fantasy in which David is
                 sort of a comic book character.  Bringing  much
                 of  the same minor key direction and imagery he
                 brought to THE SIXTH SENSE, writer/director  M.
                 Night  Shyamalan  has  a  talent for making the
                 familiar  seem   unfamiliar   and   foreboding.
                 Rating:  6  (0  to  10),  +1 (-4 to +4) Spoiler
                 warning: Probably the  less  the  viewer  knows
                 prior  to  seeing  the  film,  the  better.  My
                 recommendation would be to read nothing  beyond
                 the capsule until you have seen the film.

       M. Night Shyamalan seems to have one style of  cinematography.   He
       keeps  his scenes dark with heavy photographic filters.  Frequently
       the viewer has to work to make out the image  that  he  is  seeing.
       Some  of  his scenes seem carved out of darkness.  His writing does
       much the same.  One needs patience to make out exactly what  he  is
       showing  the viewer.  When one finds out what UNBREAKABLE is really
       about, it becomes a  sly  if  somewhat  dry  joke--a  view  of  the
       familiar shown in unfamiliar terms making it almost unrecognizable.

       The story begins following two plot lines.   One  involves  a  baby
       born in a Philadelphia hospital with two broken arms and two broken
       legs.  It seems that Elijah Price (played as  an  adult  by  Samuel
       Jackson)  was  born  with a genetic deficiency that makes his bones
       very easy to break.  Elijah becomes a dealer in comic book art  who
       is  fixated  on  the possibility that there might be some people at
       the other end of his spectrum who would  be  almost  impossible  to
       harm.   Another plotline involves a man who is the lone survivor of
       a tragic railroad accident that killed hundreds of  people.   David
       Dunne  (played  by  Bruce  Willis)  is  something of a misfit.  His
       marriage to Megan Dunne (Robin Wright)  is  falling  apart  and  he
       really  does  not  have  much  to  say  to  her.   But somebody has
       something to say to David.  An anonymous  note  on  his  windshield
       asks him if he has ever been sick a day in his life.  Come to think
       of it, has he?  For most people it would be  an  easy  question  to
       answer,  but  David  cannot  really remember ever being sick.  This
       makes him anxious to find this person who seems to know him  better
       than  he  knows  himself.   And  this  person  seems to think he is
       unbreakable.

       The great mystery is not whether David can be hurt or  not,  a  pin
       could tell that in a few seconds, but where is Shyamalan going with
       this buildup and will it be worth it when he gets there?  I suppose
       I  was  delighted  that  one  of  two  or three possibilities I was
       expecting turned out to be the one that was true.  This is a  story
       that  could  be  told  with  a  lot of fun, but Shyamalan keeps the
       proceedings grim and emotions muted to avoid tipping his  hand  too
       soon.   The  photography is very much as used in Film Noir and some
       of his images are borrowed from comic book art.  One shot is filmed
       between  the  backs  of  two seats on a train.  To give the feel of
       comic book panels the camera moves back and forth to frame one face
       and then the other between the seats.  Frequently the camera angles
       are strange  and  disorienting,  more  than  once  turning  objects
       entirely  upside-down.   The  people  we  see  are  cold with their
       emotions kept tightly bottled.  The plot unfolds  very  slowly  and
       deliberately.  There is one chase in the film and there we are less
       concerned at the outcome than we are  with  whether  the  character
       will hurt himself.

       As he did with THE  SIXTH  SENSE  Bruce  Willis  gives  a  careful,
       measured performance.  His marriage with the Robin Wright character
       seems to have  died  of  the  cold  because  each  bottles  up  any
       emotions.  It is difficult for the viewer to empathize with either.
       Almost all the emotion in the film is shown by Samuel  Jackson  and
       then  it  is over abstractions.  He is, for example, angered when a
       valuable patron turns out to be buying comic art  not  for  himself
       but for his four-year-old son.

       The surprises in this film are  more  complex  than  in  THE  SIXTH
       SENSE,  but  they  will  be  appreciated by a narrower audience.  I
       would give this film a 6 on the 0 to 10 scale and a +1 on the -4 to
       +4 scale. [-mrl]

                                          Mark Leeper
                                          HO 1K-644 732-817-5619
                                          mleeper@avaya.com